Starting

• In our view…

• Our strongest argument is…

• The future demands…

Attacking

• How would you solve the ethical problem?

• Is that realistic in real life?

• What if the system fails?

Defending

• Let me clarify that point…

• Even if that happens, the benefits outweigh the risks…

Closing

• This scenario is not just possible — it's inevitable.

Team FOR – “Pro-AI Government”

This team supports the idea of cities governed entirely by artificial intelligence.
Key points:

• Zero corruption

• Efficient and fast decision-making

• Improved safety and crime prevention

• Optimized traffic, energy, and resources

• AI makes fewer operational mistakes than humans

Team AGAINST – “Human Rights Advocates”

This team believes AI-governed cities are dangerous.
Key points:

• Loss of freedom and autonomy

• Extreme surveillance

• Lack of empathy in decision-making

• Vulnerability to malfunction or hacking

• Moral decisions require human judgment

🧬 SCENARIO 2: GENETIC CUSTOMIZATION

Team FOR – “Genetic Progress Group”

This team supports the genetic design and customization of humans.
Key points:

• Elimination of genetic diseases

• Stronger, smarter, healthier future generations

• Parents can choose the best traits for their children

• Potential for longer and better lives

• Scientific progress cannot be stopped

Team AGAINST – “Ethical Guardians”

This team defends the ethical limitations of human genetic modification.
Key points:

• Creation of “genetic classes” and inequality

• Loss of natural human diversity

• Ethical and moral boundaries are crossed

• High financial cost leads to social injustice

• Human beings treated as engineered products

🤖 SCENARIO 3: WORK-FREE SOCIETY

Team FOR – “Utopian Society Group”

This team supports a society where humans do not need to work.
Key points:

• More creativity and personal freedom

• Universal basic income for all citizens

• End of burnout, stress, and overwork

• Robots complete dangerous or repetitive jobs

• People reinvent their purpose in life

Team AGAINST – “Economic Realists”

This team argues that a work-free society is unrealistic and risky.
Key points:

• Loss of motivation and personal direction

• Identity crisis (“Who am I without a job?”)

• Power concentrated in the hands of a few corporations

• Risk of extreme social inequality

• Mental health challenges due to purposelessness

🧠 SCENARIO 4: DIGITAL IMMORTALITY

Team FOR – “Digital Life Pioneers”

This team supports uploading human consciousness to the digital world.
Key points:

• No aging or disease

• Infinite learning and cognitive expansion

• Human knowledge preserved permanently

• Humanity transcends biological limits

• Individuals access a second life experience

Team AGAINST – “Human Identity Protectors”

This team defends the idea that digital immortality is not real life.
Key points:

• Personal identity may not truly transfer

• Risk of hacking, corruption, or deletion

• No physical sensations or real-world experiences

• Life loses meaning without mortality

• Ethical chaos: Who controls digital consciousness?